By Emmie Cromwell - Social science and fundamental science are two very different studies. In fact, the reference to sociology and various other behavioral studies as a form of science leads to serious problems.
As with everything else adopted by Globalist ideologues, using the term science to describe social behavior has created a gateway through which ideology can take hold of reality.
For example, gender philosophy has successfully begun encroaching on fundamental science, particularly biology, in which male and female is often a baseline characteristic used when interpreting the results of an experiment. The inclusion of philosophies such as gender spectrum to scientific study creates confusion, poorly designed experiments, and research that, in the absence of acknowledging something as basic as two sexes, holds the potential for lost discovery of life-saving treatments.
While medical and scientific journals once held high regard for fundamental science, this is no longer the case. Whether it be through indoctrination, guilt, or misguided sympathy, articles like The Psychosocial Functioning in Transgender Youth after 2 Years of Hormones are being awarded spots in publications like the New England Journal of Medicine.
This is a study about the psychosocial (psychological and social) effects of various gender-affirming hormones, and the perplexing determination of appearance congruence that is defined in cryptic detail as the youth experience alignment between their gender and their physical appearance.
Despite being designed for highly subjective interpretation, this psychosocial research and its results are represented as having validity to the level of fundamental research that has endured a structured process of evaluation. I can only shake my head at those who call themselves doctors or scientists, but see nothing wrong with this amalgamation of social and fundamental studies.
The researchers involved in this particular publication have developed an experiment that involves a psychological concern in which subjective determinations have deemed drugs and surgery as the patient’s only survivable option. As a result, there is mainstream acceptance of experimentation on children using medications with high incidences of side-effects such as depression, migraine, hot flashes, diarrhea, acne, upper respiratory tract infections, gingivitis, and accelerated growth.
Social science is dominated by intellectuals who demand acceptance of their findings without critique; something that other forms of science are not afforded and do not deserve if the ultimate goal is advancement of knowledge.
Heavy funders of social science seem dedicated to merging social and fundamental for what I can only assume is the purpose of manipulation. When someone is unable to see harm in permanently altering the body of a child, they have not simply lost their way, they have lost their soul. This is what Globalist leaders require for advancement of their totalitarian movement; a collective of people who no longer recognize the importance of life on an individual basis.
The New England Journal of Medicine and other publications are clearly being run by supporters of the Globalist movement as proven by enabling the merger of social and fundamental science that results in manipulation and lost respect for human life.